In the late ‘80s we were ready for the electric revolution, but we failed to see the importance of critical mass public awareness. We made the mistake of thinking that all we needed was a working model of the technology. It was a great learning experience. You can read all about that in a book I wrote named titled, "The Alternative". I wrote that book from a prison cell when the state of California kidnapped me and put me in prison without a trial or a conviction.
They were willing to play that card (put me in jail) mainly because of their fear of mass public awareness. (Read the book.)
We've learned that when the public is involved, the rules change. However, the media can't be relied upon to inform them. Freedom of the press belongs to those who own the press. That dog won't bite its master either. The media won't promote anything that challenges the apparent interests of its largest advertisers and stockholders.
When I operated a program to break their media freeze, the response I got was: “Go directly to jail... Don't pass Go, and don't collect $200. My Public Awareness Advertising Plan got me thrown in prison without a trial! There was no trial, because they had no time for a trial. I ran an ad on nationwide TV which showed me cutting a power line, with the voiceover announcing that the American people could disconnect from the electric company and never pay an electric bill again.
I made so much money selling an information kit from that ad, that I turned a million dollar ad campaign into a multi-million dollar ad campaign in a couple of months. At the rate I was going, every time an American turned his TV on, he would have been watching me cut a power chord with my little chant.
It caused the US Supreme Court to take a major risk in a precedent setting move they have only made once (to my knowledge) in all of US history (read the book.) They condoned putting an American citizen into prison without a trail or conviction.
My wife asked my lawyer, “How can they get away with doing this to my husband?” The answer showed me why public awareness is so important. The lawyer replied, “They can do anything they want to do, to anyone they want, as long as there aren't too many people watching.” The key is to get many people watching!
When I assembled 600 people in Los Angeles to witness my initial technology, all it got me was arrested. My technologies were confiscated without anyone seeing anything. We later proved we could make virtually free electricity with no pollution, in a court of law, but that was like the proverbial tree falling in the woods without a sound. The media refused to cover the event.
I'm convinced now that I have to be clever to get past all the dirty tricks employed to stop free enterprise in North America.
The goal is to have a massive demonstration in most every state in the Republic of the United States, and every territory of Canada for good measure.
My goal was to get into each separate state in the hopes that there might be one governor who would want what I have to offer, listen more to his people, or have a unique energy problem and have to listen.
I have learned enough about the legal system to know how they try to conceal their true motives with “Consumer Protection”.
If anyone claims to have such a technology, the court would give the Attorney General and/or the Sheriff the right to come and get it ostensibly to have it "tested" by an independent and unbiased scientist to see if it really does work. In fact they can do that if I am making that claim to anyone who is expected to give me money for any purpose at all.
If I were claiming to already have such a technology, even though no one pays anything for a free electricity registration or gives anyone any money to get involved as a witness, they would still be able to conjure their right to confiscate and test the device.
If I do not claim to have a free energy device, they cannot measure what does not exist. The last time that was done to me, the independent and unbiased scientist who tested my technology, just happened to work for Consolidated Edison Electric Company in California.
Needless to say, they found that the technology did not work.I noticed there was no punishment of any kind for the expert after we later proved in court that I was able to make free electricity and all the criminal charges were dropped.
It seems dumb to gamble with the future of the world by betting on the integrity (or bravery) of a scientist who is probably already owned by my opposition. If he says my stuff works he’s dead and if he says it doesn't’t he is rich. What would any family man do?
Having at least two machines to be seen in every state exposes the state’s deception of protecting the consumers by testing the technology for them, because that ploy only works if you just confiscate ONE of the TWO for testing. If you take them both you're trying to stop it. If you take ONE then you're testing it.
The fact that one is being demonstrated before a huge football stadium full of people while an independent and unbiased scientist is testing the other one keeps him unbiased.
So, there have to be two machines at each demonstration; one they can take and one we can demonstrate.
Two Woodstock Rock Concerts in every state would be hard to keep quiet, and impossible for the media to ignore. We would not only get past the dirty tricks of the legal and political system, but we’d get the media in the bargain. Two football stadium-sized events to demonstrate the end of pollution and energy shortages would be too much even for the spin-meister media not to cover.
We determined the size for the one hundred demonstrations by counting backwards. If there were 16 million homes that had a 30 kWh generator on them pumping all their excess power back into the grid 24 hours a day for all 365 days a year, then we could provide ALL the electricity this nation consumed last year with some to spare. In fact it comes close to 1.5 times as much.
So, there would be no reason to disconnect more than about 15% of the homes from the grid and let those homes feed the grid all the power it needs. It certainly does decentralize power production (we will discuss that more fully further on in this essay.) So, our goal would be to locate 16 million homes to use as our power plant.
That's a lot of voters to get the attention of the politicians. It would neutralize them at worst and make supporters out of them at best. In fact 1/100th of that number in every state would be a lot of voters for the governor or state congresspersons to tick off.
A scientist in one state testing one of the two devices in that state, while knowing there are 70,000 witnesses watching the other one perform, would be a little unnerving for him as well, especially with the same thing going on in all 50 states and Canada at once!
Of course, it's a tall order to get 16 million people in this country behind us, especially with all the media, Attorney’s General, BBB (Big Business Bureau), and other members of the good ol' boy team on the hunt. So, we got the idea of initially getting only ten percent of the number we really want. Then, after they've come to the event and the technology has been proven, we'll allow each of them to go home and offer nine of their friends and family the option to disconnect from their energy bills for the rest of their lives also; that way, starting with only 1.6 million witnesses, we could get all 16 million participants quickly.
One hundred demonstrations divided into 1,600,000 witnesses means we can invite 16,000 witnesses to each demonstration. That's a lot. Each of them coming in a car means a lot of cars. Why not encourage them to bring some friends to this historic event? We figured that with an average of four people per car, that would up the attendance to 64,000 witnesses. Some of them may have friends who want to bring their own carload, so filling a football stadium with 16,000 witnesses invited and registered to come should not be a problem.
So, we have been busy trying to locate the initial 1.6 million people who are willing to come to 100 demonstrations with 2 in each of the fifty states.The idea is to have the demonstrations on the same day and at the same hour. Until that time - we will NEVER claim to HAVE a completed free electricity device, so there is nothing to confiscate until the day of the event. We plan to drive in with the demo units set up on flatbed trailers as self-contained demonstrations. I guess the officials will have to get a court order and disappoint a whole football stadium full of witnesses to haul one off to a private place to test it for “consumer protection”.
I doubt that even one of these demo units will be confiscated. That means that two football stadiums full of witnesses in the state will be encouraged to witness the events. There will be one hundred football stadiums with somewhere between 6 and 7 million people who will eyewitness the event across the United States. I would say that this achieves the deterrent of there being far too many people for the opposition to play the usual “dirty tricks”.Of course the media will have to cover the event and either tell people it did or did not make free electricity. The genie will pop right out of that bottle. But, in addition to the fact that the public is aware, we will also be well on our way to gaining every home we need for grid access to replace all the oil and nuclear power plants with very green energy. All we have to do then is fund and build them.
Funding 16 million 30 kWh generators could get pretty expensive. If the most rich and powerful people in the world do not want to see this happen, it would be unreasonable to think that the banking system will be anxious to loan us the money to build them. So, what is the plan to finance such a massive undertaking? We are going to let the initial 1.6 million witnesses start the funding and then let the electric companies provide the rest of the funds. The little incentive to the initial 1,600,000 witnesses that is going to get them determined to come to the event, no matter what the media, big business, or public officials do to dissuade them, is the promise that they may never pay an energy bill at their home ever again - possibly for the rest of their life!
While people may have to pay their Title Max loan, just the idea of avoiding a home energy bill (which could be double the amount of the Title Max payment), is enough to promote the idea of free electricity.
Everyone who signs up for notification and comes (or sends someone else) with their notice to the event, is slated to be rewarded with an allocation of up to 26,000 kWh of free electricity every year for as long as we can sell the excess power produced by our units. The average ALL ELECTRIC home uses about 17,000 kWh, so this allocation is about 1.5 times as much as the average home uses that is ALL electric (appliances, hot water, heat, air conditioning, lights, and motors.) They could cheaply convert to electric heat, hot water, appliances and have all the power they need for everything for free.That carrot will get them to the show. When the technology is proven at the show, they can offer their friends and relatives an opportunity to also get set free. Their friends (who may even have scoffed at them for being so foolish to believe in free lunches) may be seeing all over boob tube news that it's real.
There’s no problem with charging people for the registration after it’s proven - but if you have a registration and you made it to the demo you'll already have your free registration. So, our 1.6 million witnesses (hopefully including you) are going home and many will offer nine of their friends the chance to pay a mere $2,000 to ultimately be disconnected from the grid and possibly never pay an energy bill again as long as they live! Half of that money will be used to build a free electricity machine for our initial witnesses. The other half will go to our UCSA dealers for them to use to prepare their businesses.Since UCSA gets half the income and the dealer involved gets the other half, there is plenty of money to build the initial 1.6 million units with the money paid by people who come in after the demonstrations.
But how do we fund the other 14.4 million units? There are two answers to that. If the banking community realizes that we can get all our funding whether or not we get it from them, I believe they will want to make loans to us to fund the building of these units and it can be done faster than five years. Assuming the worst, we can fund the other 14.4 million units with the cash flow from selling the electricity through the deregulation to the electric companies. They will be forced one way or the other to buy it (see a little further on.)
The fact is that one 30 kWh unit puts out 262,800 kWh per year minus the 26,000 allotment for the witness is a net of 236,800. ITEC shall sell this power for 5 cents per kWh for an annual income of $11,840 per unit (the payback for UCSA is well under one year even though the units are designed to produce electricity for possibly as much as 100 years.)In the first year of a five year plan we start off with the 1.6 million units on our witnesses homes. They throw off enough income to build another 1.6 million units for year number two. That means in our second year we have the original 1.6 million and the other 1.6 million bought with the first year’s cash flow, for a total of 3.2 million free electricity machines in place.
Of course these throw off enough cash flow to build another 3.2 million units for a total of 6.4 million units going into year number three. Then, 6.4 million units throw off enough cash flow to fund another 6.4 million units for a total of 12.8 million units going into year number four.It's easy to see that all 16 million units to provide 150% of all the electricity needs of this country, without any oil pollution or potentially lethal radiation contamination, could be built within 5 years of starting, even if the bankers refused to make any loans to us at all! That is precisely why they will not be able to resist and that will enable us to just do this as fast as the units can be built. There is nothing in short supply involved in the process... certainly not copper or magnets.
Now let me briefly reveal what can be done to force the cooperation of the electric utilities in this effort. In the first place the electric utilities have to be mindful of public opinion as well. Even though they have been deregulated (I believe due in large part to my own efforts with Congress in 1996) it does not mean it will be easy to get their cooperation. They most likely do not want to deal with mavericks like us, but, if we have our way, they will not have a choice.When the demonstrations reveal the technical truth, that will go a long way toward making the change. But, these guys have some alliances that will be hard to terminate. In the first place, many of them will resist giving us our price for electricity at 5 cents per kWh.
Many places currently pay far less than that for it. But, cities like New York City, L.A., San Diego, Honolulu, Chicago, and other places where they are paying a big price for power and the dense population will not let them pollute or build nuclear plants to provide their power, will have no problem paying our price. So, we will sell it mainly in those places first. We can put our little 30 kWh units on homes anywhere to feed any grid. Our first two years of expansion are pretty much guaranteed.Even if the big boys have competing technology, they will not bring it out until they lose that much market share. If there are those who resist buying our power, even though they mark it up to over a dime, they will not only have a problem with public perception, but they will have a problem with other technologies that we could employ to give them fits. Technologies like the Negawatt Circuit and the Tornado Engine.
When we get to the point that we have converted a large enough segment of the market share, it will also become apparent that we have a green energy source that can eliminate the oil pollution and public perception (even though only about 15% of the residential market will ever be directly connected to us) will force a major change in power production.Of course with a large segment of the supply on our side of the ledger, we will be able to put the coal guys out of the acid rain production business by merely dropping our wholesale prices for one year. Ours is almost all profit, and once the unit is paid for, there are no fuel costs to produce electricity for the grid. They can’t compete.
In the manner in which we are proposing to decentralize the power production in this country we will still be working with the electric utilities to maintain almost all of the market. Only 15% of one-third of the market will not be buying power from them. That's a loss of only 5% of the total overall market to eliminate the need to produce any of the power at costly power plants.Over 95% of the total consuming market will remain in tact, and we could supply it all. Why do you think the utility companies have been selling their power plants? If we decided to go the other way, and start disconnecting the big industrial or commercial users you would witness the failure of all utility companies.
We believe we have the technology that could eliminate them, but, that's Of course, the big boys are not happy about losing the control they now exercise over the liberty of the people of this nation by having them dependent upon the centralization for their energy needs.We can have a dramatic effect on the abuse of the grid with the Tesla Coil wireless alternative to the grid. Our plan is good for America and it is good for freedom. It will create far more jobs than it displaces. We still need the meter readers and grid tenders. We just do not need the same number of power plant personnel. But we will create a lot of jobs building these units and all the control devices for them, and installing and maintaining them. We also could use American labor and manufacturing to create jobs at home supplying all the other countries of the world with hardware.
In conclusion, why crapshoot with what we have to offer? People who say we do not need this kind of public awareness to get this job done may be right, but, we believe that, overkill or not, this approach is unstoppable. We have fought a long and difficult battle. We've witnessed firsthand, how ruthless (and effective) our opposition is.
We would rather over estimate them and easily defeat them than under estimate them and lose the only chance we may ever have to advance a sane energy alternative in America. All we want is a chance to prove our technology without their “dirty tricks” on a level playing field.
Thanks for your interest and attention,